Phare vs Latensy
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Phare compared with Latensy
| Detail | 
Phare | 
Latensy |
|---|
| What it does | Website and API uptime monitoring with incident management and status pages
| High-signal uptime and performance monitoring for websites, APIs, cron jobs, and feeds
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2022
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | EE
| SE
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free: 10 monitors, 5-minute checks, 30 days of history, email alerts, 1 status page. Growth: $29/month (or $278/year), 50 monitors, 10 priority monitors checked every minute, 90 days of history, Slack and webhook alerts, Executive Summary. Business: $99/month (or $940/year), 200 monitors, 25 priorit
|
|---|
| Key features | - HTTP, TCP, and ICMP ping monitoring
- Multi-region monitoring from 12 global locations
- Monitoring frequency as low as 30 seconds
- Automatic SSL certificate discovery and expiration alerts
- Multi-region incident detection with AI summaries
- Branded status pages with custom domains
- Smart alert routing with rate limiting
- REST and GraphQL API monitoring
- Custom request headers and response assertions
| - Consecutive-failure incident confirmation rules
- Latency and degradation tracking with P95 and at-risk detection
- Public status pages with 24-hour history
- Executive Summary and Impact Report
- Service tagging by client, environment, owner, and criticality
- CSV and JSON data export
- Maintenance windows to suppress alerts for planned work
- Team roles and access control
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Setup in 2 minutes with no credit card required for free plan
- Pay only for actual usage with transparent per-event pricing
- Built and hosted in the European Union with GDPR compliance
- Eco-friendly status pages with A+ sustainability rating
| - Reduces noisy alerts by confirming incidents with consecutive failures instead of single failed requests
- Distinguishes between down services and degraded performance for better signal quality
- Provides stakeholder-ready reports including Executive Summary and revenue-at-risk estimates
- Focused alternative to expensive observability suites for uptime and incident visibility
- Built specifically for agencies managing multiple client services with per-client status pages and filtering
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 62 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 7 ▲ +2 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 31 | 5 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 40 | 18 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 419 | 6 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Phare More alternatives to Latensy