Codeck vs SlimSnap
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Codeck compared with SlimSnap
| Detail |
Codeck |
SlimSnap |
| What it does | Keyboard deck for switching between Codex and Claude Code tasks
| Turn any screenshot into JSON your CLI agent can read
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | $5 USD once, plus applicable tax. Includes one Mac installation with all future updates.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Live task status for Codex and Claude Code
- Customizable keyboard shortcuts
- Quick Tasks without app switching
- Voice dictation and typing for tasks
- Project folder selection
- Auto-send to Codex or Claude Code
- Offline use for up to 30 days
- Experimental cloud task status for Codex
| - Capture any area or whole scrolling pages with keyboard shortcuts
- Annotate with arrows, callouts, and highlights
- Autoscroll for long page captures
- Supports Mac Apple Silicon and Windows 10/11
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Consolidated task management without leaving your current app
- Works offline after initial activation
- No data upload or analytics tracking
- One-time $5 USD purchase for one Mac
- Supports both Codex and Claude Code simultaneously
| - Terminal agents finally have eyes to see screenshots as structured data
- Annotations export as structured intent pointing at specific elements
- No login, no uploads, processing stays on your machine
- Open MIT schema allows building custom exporters
- Handles long pages by splitting into readable frames with unified JSON
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 12 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 5 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 28 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 0 | 87 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Codeck More alternatives to SlimSnap