Vidgo AI vs Scrnify
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | One API for image, video, LLM and 3D model APIs with unified billing and no failed job charges | Screenshot and video capture API for developers |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | AT |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Not given |
| Pricing | Nano Banana 2.1 Text to Image from $0.020/image (4 credits); GPT-6.1 Sol LLM input from $1.60/1M tokens (320 credits), output $8.00/1M tokens (1,600 credits); Claude Sonnet 5.5 input $1.60/1M tokens (320 credits), output $8.00/1M tokens (1,600 credits); Seedream 5.0 Flash $0.020/image (4 credits); G | Free: 100 lifetime units plus 100 units per billing period with active billing. Paid: First 2,000 billable units €0.008 each; billable units 2,001+ €0.005 each. Example charges: 500 units €4, 2,000 units €16, 5,000 units €31, 10,000 units €56, 15,000 units €81, 50,000 units €256. Successful non-cach |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 29 no change since last check | 18 −7 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 4 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 36 | 24 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 280 | 39 |
4 details filled in for both companies.