Vidgo AI vs NutriGraphAPI
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Vidgo AI compared with NutriGraphAPI
| Detail |
Vidgo AI |
NutriGraphAPI |
| What it does | One API for image, video, LLM and 3D model APIs with unified billing and no failed job charges
| Not given
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Nano Banana 2.1 Text to Image from $0.020/image (4 credits); GPT-6.1 Sol LLM input from $1.60/1M tokens (320 credits), output $8.00/1M tokens (1,600 credits); Claude Sonnet 5.5 input $1.60/1M tokens (320 credits), output $8.00/1M tokens (1,600 credits); Seedream 5.0 Flash $0.020/image (4 credits); G
| Free Tier: $0/month with 1,000 API calls per month and full analysed_data payload. Professional: $399/month with 100,000 API calls per month.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Single API key for image, video, LLM and 3D model access
- Async jobs with polling or webhook support
- Failed generations not charged
- Unified asset and prompt history
- Shared credit balance across all models
- Per-model pricing visibility before execution
- Support for Stripe, WeChat Pay and cryptocurrency
- Free studio workspace for testing models
- Multiple payment methods accepted
| - Per-ingredient allergen trees with 14 allergen field pairs
- Six quality scores: NOVA, Nutri-Score, EcoScore, plus organic, non-GMO, and recall flags
- Nutrition information with stated and AI-backfilled macros and micros
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - One unified API replaces managing multiple provider accounts and SDKs
- Shared credit balance eliminates per-provider subscriptions
- Comprehensive model catalog from leading providers
- Reselling allowed for integrators
| - Complete analysed_data payload on the free tier with no credit card required
- Per-ingredient allergen trees and dual stated/qualified fields not offered by competitors
- Supports automated and batch requests with caching permitted
- Covers 6M+ products vs 615K for Edamam and 600K for Nutritionix
- Label-sourced and AI-qualified data with provenance exposed on every response
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 29 ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 1 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 36 | 19 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 280 | 6 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Vidgo AI More alternatives to NutriGraphAPI