StackScan vs Conversee
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Search 425M+ websites by technology stack and export qualified prospect lists | Find buyers while they're deciding in public conversations |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | SG | IL |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | Pro $39/month (5 lead lists, 200,000 max rows per list, 2,500 bulk enrichment credits, 1 user), Business $79/month (25 lead lists, 300,000 max rows per list, 5,000 bulk enrichment credits, 1 user), Enterprise $189/month (unlimited lead lists, 500,000 max rows per list, 25,000 bulk enrichment credits | Starter: $99/month (45 qualified conversations/month, 1 seat); Growth: $180/month (90 qualified conversations/month, up to 5 seats); Enterprise: from $580/month (unlimited conversations, custom pricing); Agencies: custom pricing. Annual billing: Starter $79/month ($950/year), Growth $144/month ($1,7 |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 49 +1 (up) since last check | 2 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 15 | 6 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 45 | 17 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 119 | 14 |
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to StackScan More alternatives to Conversee