StackScan vs ClientFinch
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Search 425M+ websites by technology stack and export qualified prospect lists | UK website opportunity discovery for agencies |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | SG | GB |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | Pro $39/month (5 lead lists, 200,000 max rows per list, 2,500 bulk enrichment credits, 1 user), Business $79/month (25 lead lists, 300,000 max rows per list, 5,000 bulk enrichment credits, 1 user), Enterprise $189/month (unlimited lead lists, 500,000 max rows per list, 25,000 bulk enrichment credits | Free: £0 with five distinct company detail views per UTC day. Pro: £49 per month with unlimited company detail views and CSV export. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 49 +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 15 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 45 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 119 | 0 |
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to StackScan More alternatives to ClientFinch