Scrnify vs NutriGraphAPI

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Scrnify compared with NutriGraphAPI
Detail	Scrnify	NutriGraphAPI
What it does	Screenshot and video capture API for developers	Not given
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	AT	Not given
Pricing model	Not given	Freemium
Pricing	Free: 100 lifetime units plus 100 units per billing period with active billing. Paid: First 2,000 billable units €0.008 each; billable units 2,001+ €0.005 each. Example charges: 500 units €4, 2,000 units €16, 5,000 units €31, 10,000 units €56, 15,000 units €81, 50,000 units €256. Successful non-cach	Free Tier: $0/month with 1,000 API calls per month and full analysed_data payload. Professional: $399/month with 100,000 API calls per month.
Key features	Full-page screenshot capture CSS selector element capture Multiple image formats: PNG, JPEG, WebP Multiple video formats: MP4, WebM, animated GIF Custom viewport sizes Signed API requests with HMAC-SHA256 CLI for terminal and CI No local browser setup required Integration with Make.com, n8n, Airtable, NocoDB Pay-as-you-go pricing with no monthly fee	Per-ingredient allergen trees with 14 allergen field pairs Six quality scores: NOVA, Nutri-Score, EcoScore, plus organic, non-GMO, and recall flags Nutrition information with stated and AI-backfilled macros and micros
What makes it different	Remote browser infrastructure eliminates need for local Chrome, Playwright, or Puppeteer setup Graduated pricing that drops after 2,000 units with no fixed monthly fee or minimum Multiple capture modes: full-page, viewport, CSS selector, and video without changing infrastructure Built for repeat jobs with signed requests and caching support Single API endpoint and CLI for all capture needs	Complete analysed_data payload on the free tier with no credit card required Per-ingredient allergen trees and dual stated/qualified fields not offered by competitors Supports automated and batch requests with caching permitted Covers 6M+ products vs 615K for Edamam and 600K for Nutritionix Label-sourced and AI-qualified data with provenance exposed on every response
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	18 −7 (down) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	4	1
Citation Flow (Majestic)	24	19
Referring domains (Majestic)	39	6

3 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Scrnify More alternatives to NutriGraphAPI