NutriGraphAPI vs TokenSpend

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

NutriGraphAPI compared with TokenSpend
Detail	NutriGraphAPI	TokenSpend
What it does	Not given	Route every model, read every receipt.
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free Tier: $0/month with 1,000 API calls per month and full analysed_data payload. Professional: $399/month with 100,000 API calls per month.	Bring your own key: free. Managed credits: pay per token at list price, 5% fee when purchasing credits. Top-ups start at $5.
Key features	Per-ingredient allergen trees with 14 allergen field pairs Six quality scores: NOVA, Nutri-Score, EcoScore, plus organic, non-GMO, and recall flags Nutrition information with stated and AI-backfilled macros and micros	Routes 119 models from 21 vendors No markup on tokens at list price Metered receipt for every request Join spend to merged pull requests Drop-in OpenAI SDK compatibility Prompts not stored
What makes it different	Complete analysed_data payload on the free tier with no credit card required Per-ingredient allergen trees and dual stated/qualified fields not offered by competitors Supports automated and batch requests with caching permitted Covers 6M+ products vs 615K for Edamam and 600K for Nutritionix Label-sourced and AI-qualified data with provenance exposed on every response	Single endpoint for all frontier AI models Exact receipts at list price with no token markup Spend tied to shipped code
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	Not checked yet no change since last check	7 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	1	4
Citation Flow (Majestic)	19	26
Referring domains (Majestic)	6	35

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to NutriGraphAPI More alternatives to TokenSpend