MNRK vs Substrat

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

MNRK compared with Substrat
Detail	MNRK	Substrat
What it does	Self-hosted workspace for agencies with projects, time tracking and client delivery	A runtime-enforced substrate for building vertical B2B SaaS
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	ES
Pricing model	Paid	Not given
Pricing	Not given	Not given
Key features	Project management Time tracking Client delivery tools Self-hosted deployment Chrome extension Optional third-party integrations	Work order engine with state machine and append-only reporting Invoicing engine with immutable export basis Booking engine with capacity allocation and double-booking prevention Protocol/checklist engine with sign and immutability Absence ledger engine with append-only balance tracking Metering engine for billable usage tracking Single-use invite engine with secure identifier handling Runtime enforcement of permissions and isolation GDPR compliance enforced at runtime Pull request previews with production scope forking
What makes it different	Own server control with no ongoing rental costs All-in-one tool combining projects, time and client delivery Full data control and responsibility	Guarantees instead of conventions: runtime enforcement prevents data leaks and permission errors by design, not developer discipline Domain engines own invariants, not vocabulary: reusable logic without tight coupling to specific business requirements Self-hostable vertical on pure SQLite with no platform dependency
Community votes	2	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	5 −1 (down) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	0	22
Referring domains (Majestic)	0	2

3 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to MNRK More alternatives to Substrat