libyears vs Supafork
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
libyears compared with Supafork
| Detail | L
libyears | 
Supafork |
|---|
| What it does | Dependency debt across every client repo
| AI Agent Native Version Control, Git for AI Agents, Filesystem for Agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Daily or weekly rescans of dependencies
- Tracks dependency versions and how far behind latest
- Identifies end-of-life and dangerous dependencies
- Client workspaces for multi-organization management
- CSV and CycloneDX export
- Trend and burn-down metrics
- Slack alerts for dependency issues
- Client reports with effort estimates
| - One source of truth for every agent prompt, session, tool call, and skill
- Automatic harness detection and session import
- Sessions across harnesses including Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, DeepSeek, Pi, Gemini CLI, Cursor, GitHub Copilot CLI, Droid
- Share sessions with team or via public link
- Move sessions from one harness to another
- Continue sessions on cloud
- S3-backed versioned filesystem with POSIX semantics
- Instant branches and sub-second forks for parallel agent execution
- Full environment control for agents including dependencies, secrets, runtime, and version history
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Flat per repository pricing, never per developer
- Read-only access without adding pull requests
- Scans across multiple client organizations
- Command-line tool for offline reports
| - Wire-compatible with Git so agents already know the model
- Treats every action as part of a swarm, not like a human waiting at keyboard
- Reads harness stores after the fact to avoid impacting agent performance
- Portable across harnesses, not trapped in one tool
- Version control first, agent-native by design, Git-compatible at surface
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 11 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 2 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 20 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 25 | 52 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to libyears More alternatives to Supafork