libyears vs Forgejo
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
libyears compared with Forgejo
| Detail | L
libyears | 
Forgejo |
|---|
| What it does | Dependency debt across every client repo
| Beyond coding. We forge.
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| DE
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Daily or weekly rescans of dependencies
- Tracks dependency versions and how far behind latest
- Identifies end-of-life and dangerous dependencies
- Client workspaces for multi-organization management
- CSV and CycloneDX export
- Trend and burn-down metrics
- Slack alerts for dependency issues
- Client reports with effort estimates
| - Self-hosted deployment
- Federation capabilities using ForgeFed
- GitHub-compatible interface
- Privacy-focused design
- Security focused development
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Flat per repository pricing, never per developer
- Read-only access without adding pull requests
- Scans across multiple client organizations
- Command-line tool for offline reports
| - Lightweight with low server requirements
- Managed by democratic non-profit organization
- Decentralized federation development
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 85 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 39 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 61 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 25 | 10957 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to libyears More alternatives to Forgejo