Forgejo vs Raeva

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Forgejo compared with Raeva
Detail	Forgejo	Raeva
What it does	Beyond coding. We forge.	Open-source lockfile companion for Maven with reproducible builds
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	DE	Not given
Pricing model	Open source	Not given
Pricing	Not given	Free tier: Raeva CLI forever with no account required, including lockfiles, offline export, vulnerability scanning, and SBOMs. Team tier: private Maven registry with immutable releases and organization-wide token management, with flat annual pricing per organization. Enterprise: dedicated deployment
Key features	Self-hosted deployment Federation capabilities using ForgeFed GitHub-compatible interface Privacy-focused design Security focused development	Lockfile generation with SHA-256 checksums Offline-ready builds Vulnerability scanning SBOM generation Single native binary with no JVM dependency Private Maven registry with immutable releases Works with Maven and Gradle unchanged Organization-wide token management Reproducibility reports for CI runs
What makes it different	Lightweight with low server requirements Managed by democratic non-profit organization Decentralized federation development	Verified against 46 open-source projects including Netty, Spring AI, and Jenkins No changes needed to existing Maven projects Native binary with no JVM overhead
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	85 no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	39	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	61	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	10957	0

3 details filled in for both companies.