ControllerTest vs Tabwalk
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
ControllerTest compared with Tabwalk
| Detail | 
ControllerTest | 
Tabwalk |
|---|
| What it does | Browser-based gamepad diagnostics for button input, stick drift, deadzone, polling rate and vibration testing
| Self-hosted accessibility monitoring that shows what is actually broken on your site
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| No cost. The self-hosted version is AGPL-3.0 with no account and no feature limits.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Button input testing with live mapping display
- Stick drift measurement and idle offset detection
- Deadzone suggestion based on stick offset
- Trigger travel range analysis
- Stick circularity testing for even gate coverage
- Polling rate and stability estimation
- Vibration and haptics capability detection
- Health score summary across all metrics
- Export reports as screenshots, CSV and JSON
- Specialized test pages for individual metrics
| - Automated WCAG checks with axe-core
- Keyboard navigation testing that simulates Tab presses
- Consolidated problem reporting with page counts
- Daily or weekly automatic site scanning
- GitHub Action for CI/CD integration
- Notifications via Slack, Discord, email or ntfy
- Single sign-on with Google, Microsoft, Keycloak or OpenID Connect
- Interface available in eight languages
- Human review flagging for issues machines cannot judge
- Self-hosted with Docker deployment
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Runs entirely in browser with no data upload required
- Provides transparent methodology explaining confidence limits of each measurement
- Includes community benchmarks and real device reference data
- Works with any gamepad via standard browser Gamepad API
- Independent and unaffiliated with controller manufacturers
| - Shows what machines cannot judge, not just automated check results
- Real keyboard navigation testing that catches focus traps and hidden focus
- Completely free and open source with no feature limits or accounts required
- No modifications to websites and no false compliance claims
- Self-hosted with no data sent to external servers
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 11 ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 5 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 24 | 7 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 32 | 3 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ControllerTest More alternatives to Tabwalk