Citehound vs BeaverCheck
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Citehound compared with BeaverCheck
| Detail | 
Citehound | 
BeaverCheck |
|---|
| What it does | Free AI-readiness scan, then fix what holds your site back from AI assistants
| Not given
|
|---|
| Stage | MVP
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | TR
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Scan: free. Pro: $39/month or $390/year (first month free for first 10 early-access users). Fix: from $299 fixed quote (includes 3 months of Pro). Beyond: $490/month with 3-month minimum (includes Pro). Early-access pricing; payments open soon.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Scan 16 technical and trust signals across AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and 7 others)
- 100-point readiness score weighted across Discoverability, Technical foundation, and Content & trust pillars
- Evaluate canonical, language, title, description, Open Graph and structured data signals
- Test AI crawler robots.txt and sitemap access, plus llms.txt
- Pro citation check: test if Claude (ChatGPT coming) names your brand in response to buyer questions
- Weekly homepage re-scans with email alerts for up to 5 domains (Pro)
- Fix service applies technical changes by hand or delivers files with instructions
- Beyond service writes 4 edited content pieces monthly approved before publishing
- Free generators for schema, robots.txt and llms.txt
- Public API and integrations: Claude connector, MCP, n8n node, command-line tool
| - 100+ automated checks across 8 categories
- Mobile and desktop Lighthouse audits
- Security header analysis including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame
- SSL certificate chain and expiry monitoring
- Core Web Vitals measurement
- Technology stack detection
- Accessibility audit with screenshot contrast analysis
- PDF, JSON, and Markdown export
- Permanent public report URLs
- Free tools including DNS lookup, SSL checker, and redirect tracer
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Free scan requires no email or signup and runs in browser using publicly visible site data
- Benchmarks grounded in 219 scanned sites across 6 categories with category-specific playbooks
- Fix price is fixed quote that does not change once agreed, with before-and-after verification
- All four steps in one workspace so nothing gets lost between scan, report, fixes and content
- Founded by Andaç Üzel with 10 years of content editing, content marketing and technical team collaboration
| - Truly free with no account, credit card, or subscription required
- Comprehensive 8-category scoring system in addition to Lighthouse
- Globally distributed workers to test from multiple regions
- Permanent public URLs allow reports to be shared and compared over time
- Fast and lightweight, built with Go and Alpine.js
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 13 ▲ +9 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 4 | 3 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 24 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 4 | 31 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Citehound More alternatives to BeaverCheck